Search
- Page Path
-
HOME
> Search
How I Do It
- Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with an Inferior Approach: How I Do It
-
Young Il Kim, Hayoung Lee, Min Hyun Kim
-
J Surg Innov Educ. 2024;1(1):6-9. Published online June 28, 2024
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69474/jsie.2024.00038
-
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Since its introduction in the early 1990s, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been extensively validated through randomized controlled trials, establishing its safety and efficacy from oncological and technical standpoints. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) procedures exhibit variability in dissection extent and initiation sites. Complete mesocolic excision is essential in LRHC, involving precise dissection along embryologic planes and varying in lymph node dissection extent (D2 or D3). Other variations in LRHC include the use of the medial approach (or superior mesenteric vein [SMV]-first approach), where dissection starts along the SMV, the lateral approach (or inferior approach), starting with meso-ileal and retroperitoneal dissection, and the superior approach, initiated by separation of the omentum and transverse colon. This paper presents a case of LRHC for ascending colon cancer using an inferior approach. The procedure included trocar placement, followed by inferior, superior, and medial dissection phases, concluding with specimen extraction and extracorporeal anastomosis. With a standardized procedure, mastery of diverse approaches (inferior, medial, and superior) remains crucial, as the most appropriate method varies among cases.
- Optimized Surgical Techniques in Laparoscopic Living-Donor Right Hemihepatectomy Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Images
-
YoungRok Choi, Suk Kyun Hong, Nam-Joon Yi, Kwang-Woong Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh
-
J Surg Innov Educ. 2024;1(1):14-17. Published online June 26, 2024
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69474/jsie.2024.00066
-
-
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- This paper outlines the surgical technique for laparoscopic living-donor right hemihepatectomy (LLDRH), a minimally invasive procedure that increases graft safety and reduces donor morbidity. The technique includes careful patient selection, precise port placement, meticulous liver mobilization, and careful parenchymal dissection, followed by secure graft extraction and effective hemostasis. LLDRH offers several advantages over open living-donor surgery, including lower costs, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and better cosmetic results. The use of advanced three-dimensional laparoscopic systems and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging has further increased the safety and effectiveness of this procedure. As laparoscopic technology continues to evolve, LLDRH is likely to become more widely adopted, offering a valuable option for liver transplantation programs. A video clip shows a 32-year-old woman with a body mass index of 25.7 kg/m2 who donated her right liver. Her remnant liver volume was 34%, and the estimated graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 1.2. The operation time was 240 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 150 mL. She was discharged on the fifth postoperative day without any complications.
- Techniques in Jejunojejunostomy, Gastrojejunostomy, and Esophagojejunostomy in Reduced-Port Gastrectomy
-
Sa-Hong Min
-
J Surg Innov Educ. 2024;1(1):3-5. Published online June 25, 2024
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69474/jsie.2024.00031
-
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery aims to reduce morbidity and mortality while maintaining satisfactory oncological outcomes. Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a standard treatment, offering reduced pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. Reduced-port gastrectomy has gained popularity due to its requirement for limited assistants; however, it poses unique challenges. This paper shares the techniques used in three cases of jejunojejunostomy, gastrojejunostomy, and esophagojejunostomy during reduced-port gastrectomy. Reduced-port techniques were successfully implemented in all three cases. Key steps included proper port placement, the use of tagging sutures, and strategic stapler insertion and adjustment. The reduced-port approach demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness despite its inherent challenges. Reduced-port gastrectomy can be effectively performed with a careful technique and meticulous planning, despite the challenges of transitioning from conventional five-port techniques. Using fewer ports results in less pain, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays without compromising oncologic outcomes. These techniques can be helpful for trainees and novice surgeons, though careful candidate selection is paramount.
TOP